Your logic is extremely flawed. I write something on the Internet. You comment on me personally more than what was written, making no direct reference back to the parts that would lead you to believe the infatuation ideal you presented. I respond.

You respond again, passive-aggressively. I respond. You again respond passive-aggressively, talking about my response to something that you wrote calling it an inference vs. what I said as an inference of you trying to disparage me. Sorry, but that's backwards. Your comment was disparaging. My essay wasn't written for you. Your comment was written for me.

What you did was make an off-handed comment on the Internet, not expecting to have to justify it...and you should. I am all for rational debate, but if you go back to your comment, was it an inference or a prejudice against people who don't view love the way that you do. If you can honestly walk away and say your initial comment had not intent to be disparaging, I don't think it will be an inference by me to say you are bit out of touch with your words.